ON COLUMBUS DAY, CELEBRATE WESTERN CIVILIZATION, NOT MULTICULTURALISM
By Michael S. Berliner
Columbus Day approaches and this year has a special
meaning. Christopher
Columbus is a carrier of Western Civilization and the very values attacked
by terrorists on September 11. To the "politically correct," Columbus
Day is
an occasion to be mourned. They have mourned, they have attacked, and
they
have intimidated schools across the country into replacing Columbus
Day
celebrations with "ethnic diversity" days.
The politically correct view is that Columbus did
not discover America,
because people had lived here for thousands of years. Worse yet, it's
claimed, the main legacy of Columbus is death and destruction. Columbus
is
routinely vilified as a symbol of slavery and genocide, and the celebration
of his arrival likened to a celebration of Hitler and the Holocaust.
The
attacks on Columbus are ominous, because the actual target is Western
civilization.
Did Columbus "discover" America? Yes--in every important
respect. This
does not mean that no human eye had been cast on America before Columbus
arrived. It does mean that Columbus brought America to the attention
of the
civilized world, i.e., to the growing, scientific civilizations of
Western
Europe. The result, ultimately, was the United States of America. It
was
Columbus' discovery for Western Europe that led to the influx of ideas
and
people on which this nation was founded--and on which it still rests.
The
opening of America brought the ideas and achievements of Aristotle,
Galileo,
Newton, and the thousands of thinkers, writers, and inventors who followed.
Prior to 1492, what is now the United States was
sparsely inhabited,
unused, and undeveloped. The inhabitants were primarily hunter-gatherers,
wandering across the land, living from hand-to-mouth and from day-to-day.
There was virtually no change, no growth for thousands of years. With
rare
exception, life was nasty, brutish, and short: there was no wheel,
no
written language, no division of labor, little agriculture and scant
permanent settlement; but there were endless, bloody wars. Whatever
the
problems it brought, the vilified Western culture also brought enormous,
undreamed-of benefits, without which most of today's Indians would
be
infinitely poorer or not even alive.
Columbus should be honored, for in so doing, we honor
Western
civilization. But the critics do not want to bestow such honor, because
their real goal is to denigrate the values of Western civilization
and to
glorify the primitivism, mysticism, and collectivism embodied in the
tribal
cultures of American Indians. They decry the glorification of the West
as
"cultural imperialism" and "Eurocentrism." We should, they claim,
replace
our reverence for Western civilization with multi-culturalism, which
regards
all cultures (including vicious tyrannies) as morally equal. In fact,
they
aren't. Some cultures are better than others: a free society is better
than
slavery; reason is better than brute force as a way to deal with other
men;
productivity is better than stagnation. In fact, Western civilization
stands
for man at his best. It stands for the values that make human life
possible:
reason, science, self-reliance, individualism, ambition, productive
achievement. The values of Western civilization are values for all
men; they
cut across gender, ethnicity, and geography. We should honor Western
civilization not for the ethnocentric reason that some of us happen
to have
European ancestors but because it is the objectively superior culture.
Underlying the political collectivism of the anti-Columbus
crowd is a
racist view of human nature. They claim that one's identity is primarily
ethnic: if one thinks his ancestors were good, he will supposedly feel
good
about himself; if he thinks his ancestors were bad, he will supposedly
feel
self-loathing. But it doesn't work; the achievements or failures of
one's
ancestors are monumentally irrelevant to one's actual worth as a person.
Only the lack of a sense of self leads one to look to others to provide
what
passes for a sense of identity. Neither the deeds nor misdeeds of others
are
his own; he can take neither credit nor blame for what someone else
chose to
do. There are no racial achievements or racial failures, only individual
achievements and individual failures. One cannot inherit moral worth
or
moral vice. "Self-esteem through others" is a self-contradiction.
Thus the sham of "preserving one's heritage" as a
rational life goal.
Thus the cruel hoax of "multicultural education" as an antidote to
racism:
it will continue to create more racism. Individualism is the only
alternative to the racism of political correctness. We must recognize
that
everyone is a sovereign entity, with the power of choice and independent
judgment. That is the ultimate value of Western civilization, and it
should
be proudly proclaimed.
____________________________________________________________________________
____
Dr. Berliner is a member of the Board of Directors of the Ayn Rand
Institute
in Marina del Rey, California. The Institute promotes the philosophy
of Ayn
Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead. Write to
Berliner at
medialink@aynrand.org
For more information go to http://www.aynrand.org
THE AYN RAND INSTITUTE
This op-ed can be downloaded from:
http://www.aynrand.org/medialink/columbus.html
---------------------------
REDISTRIBUTING THIS ARTICLE
---------------------------
Please feel free to forward this requested op-ed to friends,
family, associates or interested parties who would want to
receive it. Do not send the piece to media with the view
that they might publish it. All such contact and permissions
must come from the Ayn Rand Institute (ARI).
---------
COPYRIGHT
---------
The Ayn Rand Institute op-eds are copyrighted. If you want
to reproduce, publish or post this op-ed, you must obtain
written permission from ARI. For reprint permission please
write media@aynrand.org. If this is given, you must
reproduce the text of the article, the writer's name, and
ARI contact details fully and exactly, and affix the
following copyright notice at the beginning of the article:
"This editorial is copyrighted by the Ayn Rand Institute and
reproduced here with permission. The Web site address for
the Ayn Rand Institute is http://www.aynrand.org.
Inquiries
about the Institute and its projects can be directed to
mail@aynrand.org. You may print one copy of this op-ed for
personal use."