TRANSFER OF TIME ACROSS FROM AN ACCELERATED TO AN INERTIALLY EXPANDING CLOCK

Commensurability is a more basic property than the property of clocks being synchronized. Before one tries to synchronize two clocks, one must first ascertain that they are commensurable.

Furthermore, two commensurable clocks cannot be synchronized unless there is a two-way interaction between them. In the context of an inertially expanding or an accelerated coordinate frame (Figure 9 or 10) such an interaction consists of a radar (to and fro) signal between each pair of clocks, say AB and CD as in Figures 7 or 8. Such a radar signal accommodates a two-way transfer of time: AB transmits its tick number to CD, and CD sends via the return pulse its own tick number back to AB. With this mutual knowledge the two clocks can be relabelled, if necessary, to give synchronized time.

However, if there is an event horizon between clocks AB and CD, then qualitatively new considerations enter.

On one hand, at most only a one-way transfer of time is possible. The establishment of a time synchronous to both of them is out of the question.

On the other hand, that event horizon brings with it a pleasant surprise: an accelerated clock and an inertially expanding clock, which at first sight seem to be incommensurable, are in fact commensurable when there is an event horizon between them. In particular one clock can (via sympathetic resonance) exert a one-way control over the other. Here is why:

As one can see from Figure 1 there is an event horizon that separates the clocks in spacetime sector from those in spacetime sector . But the problem with taking advantage of a one-way transfer of time from CD in to AB in seems to be that the clock in is accelerated while the one in is inertially expanding. At first sight there seems to be no way that the two are commensurable as defined on page in section IV+.1667emB. One must note, however, that that definition was based on a two-way transfer of time (``AB is radar-visible to CD''). This was necessary. Indeed, the definition of boost-invariant sector as well as (``equivalence classes of geometrical clocks that can be synchronized'') depended on it.

To accommodate the context of an event horizon as a one-way membrane between clocks AB and CD, we enlarge the concept ``commensurability'' by defining the concept ``one-way commensurability''. This is done by dropping the requirement that radar units B and C be in two-way contact, and by saying that one-way contact, say from C to B, is good enough. The result of doing this is illustrated in Figure 11.

Accelerated clock CD moves along the line of sight of inertially
expanding clock AB. This clock is characterized by Doppler shift
factor .
Clock CD, whose radar units are accelerated with constant
accelerations and to the right, is
characterized by the pseudo-gravitational frequency shift factor

between them. As shown in Figure 11, clock CD sends pulses on a one-way journey to AB. There are no return pulses. Nevertheless, one can compare a sequence of pulses at B from A with a matched sequence of pulses from CD. The result is

This is the ticking rate of inertial clock AB normalized relative to accelerated clock CD. This ticking rate is a constant independent of the starting time of the two matched pulse sequences. Consequently, inertial clock AB is

a corresponding rate which is a Doppler chirp towards the red as seen by a physicist comoving with the free-float atomic clock at B. By contrast, the constancy of Eq.(27) expresses the fact that the slowdown in the

Second, if , i.e.